Located on Evans
Boulevard in Denver, Colorado Snarf’s is a small restaurant serving up
primarily sandwiches and drinks. This restaurant is always cranking out their
popular sandwiches and add alcohol to the mix for those who are of age. The
proximity to the University of Denver campus and the atmosphere seem to attract
a young, “hip” demographic. After an hour of observations on Thursday the 11th
from 12 pm to 1 pm it can be concluded that restaurants attempt to bridge the
generational gap between parents and kids by combining activities that appeal
to the youth and the feel of a new age, yet older restaurant. For Snarf’s in
particular this seems to be the vibe attempting to combine the interests of DU
students and their parents, who typically attended college in the 1980s. Also,
based on this one time observation, Snarf’s does a very good job of capturing
this particular vibe as a major observation was the demographic consisted of
nearly all college age students with a few small groups of older patrons.
The restaurant
attempted to capture an older restaurant vibe by playing the music of the 1980s.
The music was played at a very loud volume, but one where the patrons could
still talk. This seems to be important because the loud music projects a fun
and lively atmosphere that attracts college-age kids while allowing the patrons
to still converse. Music in restaurants is a fascinating phenomenon. We have
all been to more upscale restaurants where the music is quite and typically
classical. These two attributes are cited in two studies. The first determining
that softer music will increase enjoyment and decrease the amount of food
patrons eat.1,2 Also a British study showed that when a restaurant
played classical music the patrons were more willing to and spent more money
than when other types of music were played. While this is not the case it can
likely be explained by the culture of the restaurant. Snarf’s is not a
restaurant worried about the calorie-cutting of the patrons and take out was a
popular option. These two observations lead to the conclusion that Snarf’s is a
restaurant trying to attract patrons who will stay when they hear the lively
environment. Also, many of the customers were college students, a typically
poor demographic. Therefore, the British study does not relate to Snarf’s as is
trying to appeal mainly to the college students that live all around the
establishment. As a typically poor demographic the sandwiches, the main
commodity sold at the restaurant, are in the $5-$10 range. However, the money
is attempted to be made in the addition of chips and a drink, including the
alcohol at the bar. One observation that relates was that the majority of patrons,
who ordered the full meal, sandwich with chips and a drink, were typically the
older patrons. This is another aspect that appears to be attempting to close
the generational gap.
While the music,
vibrant colors, and youthful vibes are used to attract the older generation the
restaurant also uses many specifics to appeal to the college students that live
in the area. First, the workers are all of a similar age and when selling a
commodity like sandwiches peers seem to buy from peers. Also, a bar was present
and although this was not in much use at noon, at night times I have seen many
people at the Snarf’s bar. This appeals to college age kids in the reality that
they want to go to bars to hang out with friends and have a few drinks. Also,
the few arcade games attract kids to come and have fun while waiting for their
food to be made. Another aspect that likely appeals to both generations is the hand-made
assembly line, similar to a Subway type restaurant, another sandwich shop very
popular with the college generation. This relation to something familiar is
very important for the business to invoke pathos of joy in the customers. Finally,
the most important relation to the college age kids is the loud and lively
atmosphere that was discussed above. Bridging the generational gap is difficult;
however, it is an important aspect of Snarf’s
Another interesting,
yet less prevalent cultural idea that was found at Snarf’s was the lack of
diversity in food orders. While observing Snarf’s I noticed patrons had
multiple choices on the menu however, sandwiches were the only meal that was
chosen. This seemed to lead the management from Snarf’s to focus the restaurant
on sandwiches. An understandable approach for a restaurant aiming to capitalize
on college students and their wallets. The low cost, high quality and
convenient sandwiches are very appealing to the college and post-college
demographic that populates this portion of Denver. The conclusions that can be
drawn from this occurrence deal with the management of restaurants and the
attitudes of patrons. First, this shows the management of any restaurant will
do what it can to capitalize on a favorite of the customers. In the case of
Snarf’s the sandwiches are a big hit, therefore, the restaurant exploits the
sandwiches over the other food items to make more money. Also, this works
because of the patrons’ attitudes toward the sandwiches. Their favorability is
what allows the management to focus on selling sandwiches instead of the other
food products.
1van Ittersum, Koert, and Brian Wansink. “Fast Food Restaurant Lighting
and Music can Reduce Calorie Intake and Increase Sastisfaction1,2.” Psychological
Reports. 111.1 (2012): 228-232. Online.
2Wilson,
Stephanie. “The Effect of Music on Perceived Atmosphere and
Purchase Intentions in a Restaurant.” Psychology
of Music. 31.1 (2003): 93-112. Online.
1)I liked how you noticed that despite all the options on the menu, that people basically always went for the sandwich. This shows you payed attention to detail.
ReplyDelete2) Your source really helps your claim, in regards to the music, in fact I think your claim would not hold much if you didn't have the source, which is not bad.
3)Your conclusion helped sum up the paper very well, that the establishment tried to capitalize its wealth from the customers, and your examples help prove that. I would recommend that you add the music piece into your conclusion, that was a good chunk of the essay, but it is not represented in the conclusion.
4)I would re-read it,I found quite a few spelling errors and spots where you left out key ideas. Other than that, it was a good essay.